Advertisement

deadduck.jpgWhen Chef Peter Gilmore, of Gilmore’s Restaurant in West Chester invited me to write about a special Foie Gras Extravaganza he was hosting on Sunday, September 9th I told him I don’t usually do restaurant reviews. What I didn’t say was the reason. I don’t feel feel comfortable even eating in restaurants where the chef is not as skilled as I am, and the thought of reviewing such a place makes me ill with anxiety. I don’t like the idea that I might have to criticize someone who I should be mentoring, not pillorying in print.

Fortunately, I had been to Chef Gilmore’s restaurant before. I knew that he had worked for Georges Perrier (who I consider to be one of the great chefs of the modern French classical period) and most importantly, I had heard nothing but praise from everyone who had ever eaten there. In other words, I knew that I was not being asked to write about the food of someone who I’d have much to teach. I reasoned that he was peer, or perhaps more skilled than me, so the chances that I might have to give a thrumping to a novice were next to nil. Happily, I was right.

The dinner I had was an ($85) prix fixe menu of six dishes, all but one (desert) built around foie gras de canard — a noble form of duck liver that is produced by force feeding ducks to fatten them up. It is a staple ingredient of French cuisine and would be extremely rare here if not for the fact that the United States is blessed with two farms that produce it. When properly prepared in a manner that honors it’s natural texture, taste and aroma, it is miraculously buttery and subtly sweet. It’s aroma of roasted hazelnuts and caramel can make you crazy with nostalgia for things you can’t remember. It’s that good.

Of the five dishes that Chef Gilmore, assisted by sous chef Joanna Fioravanti, produced that night, only a finely puréed soup of butternut squash garnished with caramelized granny smith apples and a cream that was too subtly infused with foie gras, failed to highlight the foie gras. But that doesn’t mean that it wasn’t a superbly crafted soup. Every other component stood out and expressed itself without competing with everything else for my attention.

House smoked salmon and foie gras were tied in a perfectly cooked, perfectly tender crepe in a chef’s textbook-perfect example of a classic beggar’s purse. I could have done with out the distractingly intense andouille sausage in the bright and simple corn and sweet corn emulsion that accompanied the lobster tail and claw poached in butter and laid on a medallion of seared foie gras, but I was probably the only one in the room who fussed over this minor detail.

The magret de canard (a breast from the same duck that gives us foie gras) with port and Asian pear sauce, could only have been conceived by a classically trained chef who made his bones when I did. This classic dish from the nouvelle cuisine period of the later 1970’s, cooked skin side down in a sauté pan to render the fat, and sliced into glistening tranches, used to be one of my signature dishes, and seeing it executed so well made me very-very happy. But the killer, the one dish that caused me to realize that Peter Gilmore is very serious (and may even be able to kick my butt in the kitchen), was foie gras that had been poached in Gewürztraminer wine, molded en terrine, and served with toast.

This was a masterwork that proved to me that Chef Gilmore can accomplish what so many craftsman strive for in pursuit of their art: revelation. By not sullying up the dish with lots of ingredients and instead relying on technique to carry the dish, he revealed the nature of the foie gras. I can still taste it, it was brilliant. Now that’s cooking.

It was a great meal and a memorable one, but not really the best part of the night. That happened as I was walking back to my car and met a couple who I recognized as having just left Gilmore’s a few moments before me. They were regulars, who walked over to the restaurant several times month from their townhouse. They were so happy, I could have knocked them over with a slice of white bread.

They spoke of the hospitality of the host (Richard Rooney), the homelike ambiance of the dining room, the quality and variety of the cuisine that always surprised them and at such a fair price. But most of all they made me remember that there really aren’t very many things one can do in this life that are more gratifying than feeding and serving others well.

For more Foie Gras intrigue, read my article: Georges Perrier Please Don’t Duck

About the Author

When not involved in monomaniacal pursuits such as stonemasonry, artisanal bread making, gardening, writing, marriage and parenting, Bob Del Grosso writes for The Daily Local, for his blog A Hunger Artist, and for WC Dish.

More About Bob Del Grosso...

11 Comments So Far

  1. sarahSep 25, 2007

    i think you should prove your culinary excellence to your fellow Dish colleagues by whipping up a six course meal! we provide the cash, you do the cookin’. let mary know what you think!

  2. JoeSep 25, 2007

    Uhh.. is this guy serious? What a raging egomaniac. I don’t care if he founded the CIA. Drop the agenda and write an article.

  3. Dave SpeersSep 26, 2007

    Joe,
    Can you be more specific? What agenda do you feel Bob has? Thanks for opining.

  4. JoeSep 26, 2007

    Listen, I don’t want to sound negative or bring a bad vibe to this great site, but in my opinion Bob might be taking himself a little too seriously. Anyone who publishes the following comments (regardless of their credentials / background) needs to be taken down a few notches. Is the story about the meal or Bob? I would argue (based on the below comments) Bob, and that is an agenda. I have expected him to breakout a Ron Burgundy rant - I’m very important. I have many leather-bound books and my apartment smells of rich mahogany.

    ******

    I don’t feel feel comfortable even eating in restaurants where the chef is not as skilled as I am,

    I don’t like the idea that I might have to criticize someone who I should be mentoring

    I knew that I was not being asked to write about the food of someone who I’d have much to teach. I reasoned that he was peer, or perhaps more skilled than me, so the chances that I might have to give a thrumping to a novice were next to nil.

    Peter Gilmore is very serious (and may even be able to kick my butt in the kitchen)

  5. David SpeersSep 26, 2007

    Thanks Joe,
    That’s a legitimate critique. Any interest in writing for WC Dish? :-)

  6. Bob Del GrossoSep 27, 2007

    Joe
    Before you jump to any conclusions about the state of any writer’s ego you might try doing a bit of research. In my case I suggest you take a look at my blog (A Hunger Artist) and read some of more than 300 hundred posts there. Following that, you might head over to Ruhlman.com and read some of my posts there.

    Then if you still think I’m a raging egomaniac, so be it: I am.

    BTW, my meal at Gilmore’s was terrific. I had been hoping that animal-rights activists would show up so that I could use their antics to help promote my agenda of making sure that they don’t put my foie gras producing friends out of business. But alas, they didn’t show.

    If any reader of the blog would like to support Hudson Valley Farms, chefs like Peter Gilmore and other chefs who believe that they have the right to grow and serve foie gras, you might try going into Philly this week and eating foie gras for 5$ at one of the restaurants listed at Artisan
    Farmers Alliance

  7. TagsSep 30, 2007

    Joe,

    I’m just curious. Where do you stand on the foie gras issue? Do you think it’s cruel or do you agree with most chefs and think it’s natural, what with the duck’s proclivity for gorging when it’s the season and eating spiny sea creatures without injury. You can probably tell what my position is from the question I asked.

    What’s your position?

  8. JoeOct 01, 2007

    I don’t know enough about the issue to have an educated opinion. It seems to me that the whatever inhumane treatment ducks are subjected to is probably the same crappy treatment cows get.

    Basically, I love animals. They taste delicious.

  9. elizabethOct 02, 2007

    if the agenda of the article was to promote it might be pertinent to spend a little less time on yourself and your supposed talents. i agree that there is nothing inhumane about the production or consumption of foie gras - it is a delicious delicacy. however, the intent was to highlight foie gras and not yourself. all in all i am disappointed to have missed gilmore’s foie gras extravaganza it sounds like a spectacular dinner.

  10. BobdGOct 02, 2007

    elizabeth you wrote

    “all in all i am disappointed to have missed gilmore’s foie gras extravaganza it sounds like a spectacular dinner.”

    I’m delighted to read that my article had its intended effect.

  11. TagsOct 02, 2007

    There’s a great repudiation of the PETA arguments against foie gras today on the StudioKitchen blog (one of the best, if not THE best food blog out there today)

    http://studiokitchen.typepad.com/studiokitchen/

Comment Guidelines
Be Respectful. Do you kiss your mother with that mouth?

Although the old saying, "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all," is swell, we encourage constructive feedback (ie, be polite), and recommend backing-up your comments with evidence/witnesses.

Be Honest. Look where it got Abe Lincoln. Well, before the evening at the theater.

We don't recommend complaining just for the sake of it (see number 1), but if you have a legitimate comment, it should be shared. Also, don't hesitate to disagree with other comments, even if your opinion is in the minority. If patrons aren't honest about their experiences, restaurants won't know that there is room for improvement. And there always is.

Be Specific. "The food was good" doesn't cut it.

Each dining experience is unique, so if a dining experience moves you in any way, by all means, share the details. Choose the sensory details that impacted your experience the most and describe them in your postings. Other foodies will gobble it up—literally.

Be Concise. 'Nuf said.

What? We thought it was pretty clear the first time.

Be Helpful. Sort of like how the elves and reindeer help Santa.

Will what you have to say improve the restaurant's ability to provide impeccable service and improve the dining experience for others (again, see number 1)? If so... help away.

Show a Little Pride. No Jane or John Does please.

If you are too embarrassed to put your name as the commenter, you probably should re-evaluate your comments (you know the drill... see number 1). If you have sensitive information that you feel needs to be passed along, please use your best judgment and e-mail it to us to avoid public posting. We don't want you to have any post-post regrets.

Don't Name Names. Let's not get too personal here.

We know you want to share your experiences, both good and bad, but this isn't the place to publicly condemn or praise individual people. Feel free to comment on "the service", "the chef", or "the staff", but any positive or negative mention of specific names will be moderated.

Leave A Comment